Socialism in Europe
And The Russian Revolution
The Age of Social
Change
Before
the eighteenth century society was broadly divided into estates and
orders and it was the aristocracy and church which controlled economic
and social power. suddenly, after the revolution, it seemed possih1eto
change this. In many parts of the world including Europe and Asia, new
ideas about individual rights and who controlled social power began to
he discussed. In India, Raja Rammohan Roy and Derozio talked of the
significance of the French Revolution, and many others debated the ideas
of post-revolutionary Europe. The developments in the colonies, in turn,
reshaped these ideas of societal change.
Not everyone in
Europe, however, wanted a complete transformation of society. Responses
varied from those who accepted that some change was necessary but wished
for a gradual shift, to those who wanted to restructure society
radically. Some were conservatives; others were 'liberals' or
'radicals'. What did these terms really mean in the context of the time?
What separated these strands of politics and what linked them together?
We must remember that these terms do not mean the same thing in all
contexts or at all times.
We will look
briefly at some of the important political traditions of the nineteenth
century, and see how they influenced change. Then we will focus on one
historical event in which there was an attempt at a radical
transformation of society. Through the revolution in Russia, socialism
became one of the most significa1ilt and powerful ideas to shape society
in the twentieth century.
Liberals, Radicals
and Conservatives
One of the groups
which looked to change society were the liberals. Liberals wanted a nation
which tolerated all religions We should! remember that at this time
European states usually discriminated in favour of one religion or another
(Britain favoured the Church of England, Austria and Spain favoured the
Catholic Church). Liberals also opposed the uncontrolled power of dynastic
rulers. They wanted to safeguard the rights of individuals against
governments. They argued for a representative, elected parliamentary
government, subject to laws interpreted by a well-trained judiciary that
was independent of rulers and officials. However, they were not
(democrats, They did not believe in universal adult franchise, that is,
the right of every citizen to vote. They felt men of property mainly
should have the vote. They also did not want the vote for women.
In contrast,
radicals wanted a nation in which government was based on the majority of
a country's population. Many supported women's suffragette movements.
Unlike liberals, they opposed the privileges of great landowners and
wealthy factory owners. They were not against the existence of private
property but disliked concentration of property in the hands of a few.
Conservatives were
opposed to radicals and liberals. After the French Revolution, however,
even conservatives had opened their minds to the need for change. Earlier,
in the eighteenth century, conservatives had been generally opposed to the
idea of change. By the nineteenth century, they accepted that some change
was inevitable but believed that the past had to be respected and change
had to be brought about through a slow process.
Such differing ideas
about societal change clashed during the social and political turmoil that
followed the French Revolution. The various attempts at revolution and
national transformation in the nineteenth century helped define both the
limits and potential of these political tendencies.
Industrial Society
and Social Change
These political
trends were signs of a new time. It was a time of profound social and
economic changes. It was a time when new cities came up and new
industrialized regions developed, railways expanded and" the Industrial
Revolution occurred.
Industrialization
brought men, women and children to factories. Work hour were often long
and wages were poor. Unemployment was common, particularly during times of
low demand for industrial goods. Housing and sanitation ere problems since
towns were growing rapidly. Liberals and radicals searched for solutions
to these issues.
Almost all
industries were the property of individuals. Liberals and radicals
themselves were often property owners and employers. Having made their
wealth through trade or industrial ventures, they felt that such effort
should be encouraged - that its benefits would be achieved if the
workforce in the economy was healthy and citizens were educated. Opposed
to the privileges the old aristocracy had by birth, they firmly believed
in the value of individual effort, labour and enterprise. If freedom of
individuals was ensured, if the poor could labour, and those with capital
could operate without restraint, they believed that societies would
develop. Many working men and women who wanted changes in the world
rallied around liberal and radical groups and parties in the early
nineteenth century.
Some nationalists,
liberals and radicals wanted revolutions to put an end to the kind of
governments established in Europe in 1815. In France, Italy, Germany and
Russia, they became revolutionaries and worked to overthrow existing
monarchs. Nationalists talked of revolutions that would create 'nations'
where all citizens would have equal rights. After 1815) Giuseppe Mazzini)
an Italian nationalist, conspired with others to achieve this in Italy.
Nationalists elsewhere- including India - read his writings.
The Coming of
Socialism to Europe
Perhaps one of the
most far-reaching visions of how society should be structured was
socialism. By the mid-nineteenth century in Europe, socialism was a
well-known body of ideas that attracted widespread-attention.
Socialists were
against private property, and saw it as the root of all social ills of the
time. Why? Individuals owned the property that gave employment but the
propertied were concerned only with personal gain and not with the welfare
of those who made the property productive. So if society as a who e rather
than single individuals controlled property, more attention would be paid
to col1eaive interests. Socialists wanted this change and campaigned for
it.
How could a society
with out property operate? What would be the basis of socialist society?
Socialists had
different visions of the future. Some believed in the idea of
cooperatives. Robert Owen (1l71-1 58), a leading English manufacturer,
sought to build a cooperative community called New Harmony in Indiana
(USA). Other socialists felt that cooperatives could not be built on a
wide scale only through individual initiative they demanded that
governments encourage cooperatives. In France, for instance, Louis
Blanc (1813-1882) wanted the government to encourage cooperatives and
replace capitalist enterprises. These cooperatives were to be associations
of people who produced goods together and divided the profits according to
the work done by members.
Karl Marx(1818-1883)
and Friedrich Engels (1820-1895) added other ideas to this body of
arguments. Marx argued that industrial society was capitalist.
Capitalists owned the capital invested in factories, and the profit of
capitalists was produced by workers. The conditions of workers could not
improve as long as this profit was accumulated by private capitalists.
Workers had to overthrow capitalism and the rule of private property. Marx
believed that to free themselves from capitalist exploitation, workers had
to construct a radically socialist society where all property was socially
controlled. This would be a communist society. He was convinced that
workers would triumph in their conflict with capitalists. A communist
society was the natural society of the future.
Support for
Socialism
By the 1870s,
socialist ideas spread through Europe. To coordinate their efforts,
socialists formed an international body - namely, the Second
International.
Workers in England
and Germany began forming associations to fight for better living and
working conditions. They set up funds to help members in times of distress
and demanded a reduction of working hours and the right to vote. In
Germany, these associations worked closely with the Social Democratic
Party (SPD) and helped it win parliamentary seats. By 1905, socialists and
trade unionists formed a Labour Party in Britain and a Socialist Party in
France. However, till 1914, socialists never succeeded in forming a
government in Europe. Represented by strong figures in parliamentary
politics, their ideas did shape legislation, but governments continued to
be run by conservatives, liberals and radicals.
The Russian
Revolution
In
one of the least industrialized of European states this situation was
reversed. Socialists took over the government in Russia through the
October Revolution of 1917. The fall of monarchy in February 1917 and the
events of October are normally called the Russian Revolution.
How did this come
about? What were the social and political conditions in Russia when the
revolution occurred? To answer these questions, let us look at Russia a
few years before the revolution.
The Russian Empire
in 1914
In 1914, Tsar
Nicholas II ruled Russia and its empire. Besides the territory around
Moscow, the Russian empire included current-day Finland, Latvia,
Lithuania, Estonia, parts of Poland, Ukraine and Belarus. It stretched to
the Pacific and comprised today's Central Asian states, as well as
Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. The majority religion was Russian
Orthodox Christianity - which had grown out of the Greek Orthodox Church -
but the empire also included Catholics, Protestants, Muslims and
Buddhists.
Economy and Society
1914
At the beginning of
the twentieth century, the vast majority of Russia's people were
agriculturists. About 85 per cent of the Russian empire's population
earned their living from agriculture. This proportion was higher than in
most European countries. For instance, in France and Germany the
proportion was between 40 per cent and 50 per cent. In the empire,
cultivators produced for the market as well as for their own needs and
Russia was a major exporter of grain.
Industry was found
in pockets. Prominent industrial areas were St Petersburg and Moscow.
Craftsmen undertook much of the production, but large factories existed
alongside craft workshops. Many factories were set up in the 1890s, when
Russia's railway network was extended, and foreign investment in industry
increased. Coal production doubled and iron and steel output quadrupled.
By the 1900s, in some areas factory workers and craftsmen were almost
equal in number.
Most industry was
the private property of industrialists. Government supervised large
factories to ensure minimum wages and limited hours of work. But factory
inspectors could not prevent rules being broken. In craft units and small
workshops, the working day was sometimes 15 hours, compared with 10 or 12
hours in factories. Accommodation varied from rooms to dormitories.
Workers were a
divided social group. Some had strong links with the villages from which
they came. Others had settled in cities permanently. Workers were divided
by skill. A metalworker of St. Petersburg recalled, 'Metalworkers
considered themselves aristocrats among other workers. Their occupations
demanded more training and skill ... ' Women made up 31 per cent of the
factory labour force by 1914, but they were paid less than men (between
half and three-quarters of a man's wage). Divisions among workers showed
themselves in dress and manners too. Some workers formed associations to
help members in times of unemployment or financial hardship but such
associations were few.
Despite divisions,
workers did unite to strike work (stop work) when they disagreed with
employers about dismissals or work conditions. These strikes took place
frequently in the textile industry during 1896-1897, and in the metal
industry during 1902.
In the countryside,
peasants cultivated most of the land. But the nobility, the crown and the
Orthodox Church owned large properties. Like workers, peasants too were
divided. They were also deeply religious. But except in a few cases they
had no respect for the nobility. Nobles got their power and position
through their services to the Tsar, not through local popularity. This was
unlike France where, during the French Revolution in Brittany, peasants
respected. nobles and fought for them. In Russia, peasants wanted the land
of the nobles to be given to them. Frequently, they refused to pay rent
and even murdered landlords. In 1902, this occurred on a large scale in
south Russia. And in 1905, such incidents took place all over Russia.
Russian peasants
were different from other European peasants in another way. They pooled
their land together periodically and their commune (Mir) divided it
according to the needs of individual families.
Socialism in Russia
All political
parties were illegal in Russia before 1914. The Russian Social Democratic
Workers Party was founded in 1898 by socialists who respected Marx's
ideas. However, because of government policing, it had to operate as an
illegal organization. It set up a newspaper, mobilised workers and
organized strikes.
Some Russian
socialists felt that the Russian peasant custom of dividing land
periodically made them natural socialists. So peasants, not workers, would
be the main force of the revolution, and Russia could become socialist
more quickly than other countries. Socialists were active in the
countryside through the late nineteenth century. They formed the Socialist
Revolutionary Party in 1900. This party struggled for peasants' rights and
demanded that land belonging to nobles be transferred to peasants. Social
Democrats disagreed with Socialist Revolutionaries about peasants. Lenin
felt that peasants were not one united group. Some were poor and others
rich, some worked as laborers while others were capitalists who employed
workers. Given this 'differentiation' within them, they could not all be
part of a socialist movement.
The party was
divided over the strategy of organization. Vladimir Lenin (who led the
Bolshevik group) thought that in a repressive society like 1'sarist Russia
the party should be disciplined and should control the number and quality
of its members. Others (Mensheviks) thought that the party should be open
to all (as in Germany).
A Turbulent Time:
The 1905 Revolution
Russia was an
autocracy. Unlike other European rulers, even at the beginning of the
twentieth century, the Tsar was not subject to parliament. Liberals in
Russia campaigned to end this state of affairs. Together with the Social
Democrats and Socialist Revolutionaries, they worked with peasants and
workers during the revolution of 1905 to demand a constitution. They were
supported in the empire by nationalists (in Poland for instance) and in
Muslim-dominated areas by jadidists who wanted modernized Islam to
lead their societies.
The year 1904 was a
particularly bad one for Russian workers. Prices of essential goods rose
so quickly that real wages declined by 20 per cent. The membership of
workers' associations rose dramatically. When four members of the Assembly
of Russian Workers, which had been formed in 1904, were dismissed at the
Putilov Iron Works, there was a call for industrial action. Over the next
few days over 110,000 workers in St Petersburg went on strike demanding a
reduction in the working day to eight hours, an increase in wages and
W1provenient in working conditions.
When the procession
of workers led by Father Gapon reached the Winter Palace it was attacked
by the police and the Cossacks. Over 100 workers were killed and about 300
wounded. The incident, known as Bloody Sunday, started a series of events
that became known as the 1905 Revolution. Strikes took place allover the
country and universities closed down when student bodies staged walkouts,
complaining about the lack of civil liberties. Lawyers, doctors, engineers
and other middle-class workers established the Union of Unions and
demanded a constituent assembly.
During the 1905
Revolution, the Tsar allowed the creation of an elected consultative
Parliament or Duma. For a brief while during the revolution, there existed
a large number of trade unions and factory committees made up of factory
workers. After 1905, most committees and unions worked unofficially, since
they were declared illegal. Severe restrictions were placed on political
activity. The Tsar dismissed the first Duma within 75 days and the
re-elected second Duma within three months. He did not want any
questioning of his authority or any reduction in his power. He changed the
voting laws and packed the third Duma with conservative politicians.
Liberals and revolutionaries were kept out.
The First World War
and the Russian Empire
In 1914, war broke
out between two European alliances - Germany, Austria and Turkey (the
Central powers) and France, Britain and Russia (later Italy and Romania).
Each country had a global empire and the war was fought outside Europe as
well as in Europe. This was the First World War.
In Russia, the war
was initially popular and people rallied around Tsar Nicholas II. As the
war continued, though, the Tsar refused to consult the main parties in the
Duma. Support wore thin. Anti-German sentiments ran high, as can be seen
in the renaming of St Petersburg - a German name - as Petrograd. The
Tsarina Alexandra's German origins and poor advisers, especially a monk
called Rasputin, made the autocracy unpopular.
The First World War
on the' eastern front' differed from that on the 'western front'. In the
west, armies fought from trenches stretched along eastern France. In the
east, armies moved a good deal and fought battles leaving large
casualties. Defeats were shocking and demoralizing. Russia's armies lost
badly in Germany and Austria between 1914 and 1916. There were over 7
million casualties by 1917. As they retreated, the Russian army destroyed
crops and buildings to prevent the enemy from being able to live off the
land. The destruction of crops and buildings led to over 3 million
refugees in Russia. The situation discredited the government and the Tsar.
Soldiers did not wish to fight such a war.
The war also had a
severe impact on industry. Russia's own industries were few in number and
the country was cut off from other suppliers of industrial goods by German
control of the Baltic Sea. Industrial equipment disintegrated more rapidly
in Russia than elsewhere in Europe. By 1916, railway lines began to break
down. Able-bodied men were called up to the war. As a result, there were
labour shortages and small workshops producing essentials were shut down.
Large supplies of grain were sent to feed the army. For the people in the
cities, bread and flour became scarce. By the winter of 1916, riots at
bread shops were common.
The February
Revolution In Petrograd
In the winter of
1917, conditions in the capital, Petrograd, were grim. The layout of the
city seemed to emphasize the divisions among its people. The workers'
quarters and factories were located on the right bank of the River Neva.
On the left bank were the fashionable areas, the Winter Palace, and
official buildings, including the palace where the Duma met. In February
1917, food shortages were deeply felt in the workers' quarters. The winter
was very cold - there had been exceptional frost and heavy snow.
Parliamentarians wishing to preserve elected government, were opposed to
the Tsar's desire to dissolve the Duma.
On 22 February, a
lockout took place at a factory on the right bank. The next day, workers
in fifty factories called a strike in sympathy. In many factories, women
led the way to strikes. This came to be called the International Women's
Day. Demonstrating workers crossed from the factory quarters to the centre
of the capital- the Nevskii Prospekt. At this stage, no political party
was actively organizing the movement. As the fashionable quarters and
official buildings were surrounded by workers, the government imposed a
curfew. Demonstrators dispersed by the evening, but they came back on the
24th and 25th. The government called out the cavalry and police to keep an
eye on them.
On Sunday, 25
February, the government suspended the Duma. Politicians spoke out against
the measure. Demonstrators returned in force to the streets of the left
bank on the 26th. On the 27th, the Police Headquarters were ransacked. The
streets thronged with people raising slogans about bread, wages, better
hours and democracy. The government tried to control the situation and
called out the cavalry once again. However, the cavalry refused to fire on
the demonstrators. An officer was shot at the barracks of a regiment and
three other regiments mutinied, voting to join the striking workers had
gathered to form a 'soviet' or 'council' in the same building as the Duma
met. This was the Petrograd Soviet.
The very next day, a
delegation went to see the Tsar. Military commanders advised him to
abdicate. He followed their advice and abdicated on 2 March. Soviet
leaders and Duma leaders formed a Provisional Government to run the
country. Russia's future would be decided by a constituent assembly,
elected on the basis of universal adult suffrage. Petrograd had led the
February Revolution that brought down the monarchy in February 1917.
After February
Army officials,
landowners and industrialists were influential in the Provisional
Government. But the liberals as well as socialists among them worked
towards an elected government. Restrictions on public meetings and
associations were removed. 'Soviets', like the Petrograd Soviet, were set
up everywhere, though no common system of election was followed.
In April 1917, the
Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin returned to Russia from his exile. He and
the Bolsheviks had opposed the war since 1914. Now he felt it was time for
soviets to take over power. He declared that the war be brought to a
close, land be transferred to the peasants, and banks be nationalized.
These three demands were Lenin's 'April Theses'. He also argued that the
Bolshevik Party rename itself the Communist Party to indicate its new
radical aims. Most others in the Bolshevik Party were initially surprised
by the April Theses. They thought that the time was not yet ripe for a
socialist revolution and the Provisional Government needed to be
supported. But the developments of the subsequent months changed their
attitude.
Through the summer
the workers' movement spread. In industrial areas, factory committees were
formed which began questioning the way industrialists ran their factories.
Trade unions grew in number. Soldiers' committees were formed in the army.
In June, about 500 Soviets sent representatives to an All Russian Congress
of Soviets. As the Provisional Government saw its power reduce and
Bolshevik influence grow, it decided to take stern measures against the
spreading discontent. It resisted attempts by workers to run factories and
began arresting leaders. Popular demonstrations staged by the Bolsheviks
in July 1917 were sternly repressed. Many Bolshevik leaders had to go into
hiding or flee.
Meanwhile in the
countryside, peasants and their Socialist Revolutionary leaders pressed
for a redistribution of land. Land committees were formed to handle this.
Encouraged by the Socialist Revolutionaries, peasants seized land between
July and September 1917.
The Revolution of
October 1917
As the conflict
between the Provisional Government and the Bolsheviks grew, Lenin feared
the Provisional Government would set up a dictatorship. In September, he
began discussions for an uprising against the government. Bolshevik
supporters in the army, soviets and factories were brought together.
On 16 October 1917,
Lenin persuaded the Petrograd Soviet and the Bolshevik Party to agree to a
socialist seizure of power. A Military Revolutionary Committee was
appointed by the Soviet under Leon Trotskii to organise the seizure. The
date of the event was kept a secret.
The uprising began
on 24 October. Sensing trouble, Prime Minister Kerenskii had left the city
to summon troops. At dawn, military men loyal to the government seized the
buildings of two Bolshevik newspapers. Pro-government troops were sent to
take over telephone and telegraph offices and protect the Winter Palace.
In a swift response, the Military Revolutionary Committee ordered its
supporters to seize government offices and arrest ministers. Late in the
day, the ship Aurora shelled the Winter Palace. Other vessels sailed down
the Neva and took over various military points. By nightfall, the city was
under the committee's control and the ministers had surrendered. At a
meeting of the All Russian Congress of Soviets in Petro grad, the majority
approved the Bolshevik action. Uprisings took place in other cities. There
was heavy fighting especially in Moscow - but by December, the Bolsheviks
controlled the Moscow-Petrograd area.
What Changed after
October?
The Bolsheviks were
totally opposed to private property. Most industry and banks were
nationalized in November 1917. This meant that the government took over
ownership and management. Land was declared social property and peasants
were allowed to seize the land of the nobility. In cities, Bolsheviks
enforced the partition of large houses according to family requirements.
They banned the use of the old titles of aristocracy. To assert the
change, new uniforms were designed for the army and officials, following a
clothing competition organized in 1918 - when the Soviet hat (budeonovka)
was chosen.
The Bolshevik Party
was renamed the Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik). In November 1917, the
Bolsheviks conducted the elections to the Constituent Assembly, but they
failed to gain majority support. In January 1918, the Assembly rejected
Bolshevik measures and Lenin dismissed the Assembly. He thought the All
Russian Congress of Soviets was more democratic than an assembly elected
in uncertain conditions. In March 1918, despite opposition by their
political allies, the Bolsheviks made peace with Germany at Brest Litovsk.
In the years that followed, the Bolsheviks became the only party to
participate in the elections to the All Russian Congress of Soviets, which
became the Parliament of the country. Russia became a one-party state.
Trade unions were kept under party control. The secret police (called the
Cheka first, and later OGPU and NKVD) punished those who criticized the
Bolsheviks. Many young writers and artists rallied to the Party because it
stood for socialism and for change. After October 1917, this led to
experiments in the arts and architecture. But many became disillusioned
because of the censorship the Party encouraged.
The Civil War
When the Bolsheviks
ordered land redistribution, the Russian army began to break up. Soldiers,
mostly peasants, wished to go home for the redistribution and deserted.
Non-Bolshevik socialists, liberals and supporters of autocracy condemned
the Bolshevik uprising. Their leaders moved to south Russia and organized
troops to fight the Bolsheviks (the 'reds'). During 1918 and 1919, the
'greens' (Socialist Revolutionaries) and 'whites' (pro-Tsarists)
controlled most of the Russian empire. They were backed by French,
American, British and Japanese troops - all these forces who were worried
at the growth of socialism in Russia. As these troops and the Bolsheviks
fought a civil war, looting, banditry and famine became common.
Supporters of
private property among 'whites' took harsh steps with peasants who had
seized land. Such actions led to the loss of popular support for the
non-Bolsheviks. By January 1920, the Bolsheviks controlled most of the
former Russian empire. They succeeded due to cooperation with non-Russian
nationalities and Muslim jadidists. Cooperation did not work where
Russian colonists themselves turned Bolshevik. In Khiva, in Central Asia,
Bolshevik colonists brutally massacred local nationalists in the name of
defending socialism. In this situation, many were confused about what the
Bolshevik government represented.
Partly to remedy
this, most non-Russian nationalities were given political autonomy in the
Soviet Union (USSR) - the state the Bolsheviks created from the Russian
empire in December 1922. But since this was combined with unpopular
policies that the Bolsheviks forced the local government to follow -like
the harsh discouragement of nomadism - attempts to win over different
nationalities were only partly successful.
Making a Socialist
Society
During the civil
war, the Bolsheviks kept industries and banks nationalized. They permitted
peasants to cultivate the land that had been socialized. Bolsheviks used
confiscated land to demonstrate what collective work could be.
A process of
centralized planning was introduced. Officials assessed how the economy
could work and set targets for a five-year period. On this basis they made
the Five Year Plans. The government fixed all prices to promote industrial
growth during the first two Plans' (1927-1932 and 1933-1938). Centralized
planning led to economic growth. Industrial production increased (between
1929 and 1933 by 100 per cent in the case of oil, coal and steel). New
factory cities came into being.
However, rapid
construction led to poor working conditions. In the city of Magnitogorsk,
the construction of a steel plant was achieved in three years. Workers
lived hard lives and the result was 550 stoppages of work in the first
year alone. In living quarters, <in the wintertime, at 40 degrees below,
people had to climb down from the fourth floor and dash across the street
in order to go to the toilet'.
An extended
schooling system developed, and arrangements were made for factory workers
and peasants to enter universities. Crches were established in factories
for the children of women workers. Cheap public health care was provided.
Model living quarters were set up for workers. The effect of all this was
uneven, though, since government resources were limited.
Stalinism and
Collectivization
The period of the
early Planned Economy was linked to the disasters of the collectivization
of agriculture. By 19271928, the towns in Soviet Russia were facing an
acute problem of grain supplies. The government fixed prices at which
grain must be sold, but the peasants refused to sell their grain to
government buyers at these prices.
Stalin, who headed
the party after the death of Lenin, introduced firm emergency measures. He
believed that rich peasants and traders in the countryside were holding
stocks in the hope of higher prices. Speculation had to be stopped and
supplies confiscated.
In 1928, Party
members toured the grain-producing areas, supervising enforced grain
collections, and raiding 'kulaks' - the name for well-to-do peasants. As
shortages continued, the decision was taken to collectivize farms. It was
argued that grain shortages were partly due to the small size of holdings.
After 1917, land had been given over to peasants. These small-sized
peasant farms could not be modernized. To develop modern farms, and run
them along industrial lines with machinery, it was necessary to 'eliminate
kulaks', take away land from peasants, and establish state-controlled
large farms.
What followed was
Stalin's collectivization programmed. From 1929, the Party forced all
peasants to cultivate in collective farms (kolkho0. The bulk of land and
implements were transferred to the ownership of collective farms. Peasants
worked on the land, and the kolkhoz profit was shared. Enraged peasants
resisted the authorities and destroyed their livestock. Between 1929 and
1931, the number of cattle fell by one-third. Those who resisted
collectivization were severely punished. Many were deported and exiled. As
they resisted collectivization, peasants argued than they were not rich
and they were not against socialism. They merely did not want to work in
collective farms for a variety of reasons. Stalin's government allowed
some independent cultivation, but treated such cultivators
unsympathetically.
In spite of
collectivization, production did not increase immediately. In fact, the
bad harvests of 1930-1933 led to one of most devastating famines in Soviet
history when over 4 million died.
Many within the
Party criticized the confusion in industrial production under the Planned
Economy and the consequences of collectivization. Stalin and his
sympathizers charged these critics with conspiracy against socialism.
Accusations were made throughout the country, and by 1939, over 2 million
were in prisons or labor camps. Most were innocent of the crimes, but no
one spoke for them. A large number were forced to make false confessions
under torture and were executed - several among them were talented
professionals.
The Global Influence
of the Russian Revolution and the USSR
Existing socialist
parties in Europe did not wholly approve of the way the Bolsheviks took
power - and kept it. However, the possibility of a workers' state fired
people's imagination across the world. In many countries, communist
parties were formed - like the Communist Party of Great Britain. The
Bolsheviks encouraged colonial peoples to follow their experiment. Many
non-Russians from outside the USSR participated in the Conference of the
Peoples of the East (1920) and the Bolshevik-founded Comintern (an
international union of pro-Bolshevik socialist parties). Some received
education in the USSR's Communist University of the Workers of the East.
By the time of the outbreak of the Second World War, the USSR had given
socialism a global face and world stature.
Yet by the 1950s it
was acknowledged within the country that the style of government in the
USSR was not in keeping with the ideals of the Russian Revolution. In the
world socialist movement too it was recognized that all was not well in
the Soviet Union. A backward country had become a great power. Its
industries and agriculture had developed and the poor were being fed. But
it had denied the essential freedoms to its citizens and carried out its
developmental projects through repressive policies. By the end of the
twentieth century, the international reputation of the USSR as a socialist
country had declined though it was recognized that socialist ideals still
enjoyed respect among its people. But in each country the ideas of
socialism were rethought in a variety of different ways.